For India, this does not seem to be the opportune time to talk of Gandhi. We have recently celebrated Independence day and Gandhi’s birthday is still some way to go. But there are compulsions. As the rupee tumbles and the economy crumbles, the economists, the so called soothsayers who claim to have the magic wand but have hardly been reassuring, keep on blowing their trumpets. However, the solutions they offer for our economic woes just don’t seem to work. Two Nobel laureates with draggers drawn at one another are advocating their straight jacket solutions which ironically are contradictory to one another. And to make things worse we keep on swapping spin doctors with IMF. The tragedy is that both the international as well as the national economy is in bad shape. Moral of the story lies in understanding the fact that a solution that cannot work will not work. Naturally, the mayhem at market continues.
Under such a grim situation it would sound out of sync to talk of Gandhism. More so, when Gandhi himself had proclaimed that there is no such thing as Gandhism. In fact, he was candid in confessing that he did not originate any new principle or doctrine and had nothing new to teach the world. He was honest in proclaiming that truth and non-violence are as old as the hills. In fact, the ancient Indian thought has unequivocally emphasized that Saanch barober tap nahin, Jhuth barober paap; jaake hridaye saanch hai, taake hridaye aap, that is, there is no worship equal to truth and no sin equal to lie; and the person who has truth in his heart, God lives there.
But that notwithstanding there is a Gandhian way, an idealism which is, on the contrary, closer to realism. And it is this Gandhian way that can be termed as Gandhism.
As calculations of IMF and World bank economists on poverty reduction and growth rate go haywire popular misconceptions need to give way to pragmatic reappraisal. There needs to be an Indian model to solve India’s economic woes. And it is here that we need to look back to Gandhiism. Rather, look forward to Gandhi’s prescriptions. The so called market determined theories propounded by, to name a popular Hollywood film, ‘Men in Black’ from the luxurious offices of Washington, have faltered on the ground. It is not a question of reforms versus non-reforms, or even more reforms. It is a matter of redefining reforms. Particularly, in Gandhi’s own country India. Economists have been ridiculing the Gandhian model of economic development as an unworkable proposition. But the other side of the story is that the model these so called economists have given is not working. Should it not be thought over that on one hand we are dismissing a model as utopian without trying, while on the other favoring the one that is not working despite our best efforts. This seems to be impervious to reason.
It is time that advocates of Washington school of thought revisited Gandhi’s forgotten injunction – “Whenever you are in doubt, or when the self becomes too much with you, apply the following test. Recall the face of the poorest and the weakest man [woman] whom you may have seen, and ask yourself, if the step you contemplate is going to be of any use to him [her]. Will he [she] gain anything by it? Will it restore him [her] to a control over his [her] own life and destiny? In other words, will it lead to swaraj [freedom] for the hungry and spiritually starving millions? Then you will find your doubts and yourself melt away.”
As we prepare for the last leg of so called reforms before the next Lok Sabha elections, let us try to understand and revisit Gandhism.