As we celebrate one more milestone of science, the 102nd Indian Science Congress, it is time for stock taking. There is little doubt that in the present century science and technology will dominate. But for that, a conducive mind set will be needed. Thus, more than science and technology, it will scientific temper that will be required. The temper to think in scientific and rational way, to ask right questions and formulate right answers.
Not mere knowledge, but its application for the benefit of the society. Possession of knowledge is much different from its application. Knowledge is simply the amount of information one has. It is scientific temper that makes this information productive. Science should focus on not just knowledge but scientific attitude.
It is only people who were blessed with scientific temper who contributed to the betterment of this world. Newton was certainly not the first man to see the apple falling downwards. But he was the first man to question why? And that made the difference. Bacon, Kepler, Galileo, they were all men of scientific temper. So was Raja Ram Mohan Roy. And we all know what difference their presence made to the society.
Many people know many things. Some question the basis of such knowledge and only a few understand it. It is this understanding which is the cardinal principal of scientific temper. It was Descartes, the father of modern western philosophy, who first brought the question of understanding to the fore and his principal tool was doubt. ‘To doubt’ is ‘to exist’ or ‘cogito ergo sum’ as Descartes had put it. In fact, for Descartes, the very essence of existence was doubt. ‘I doubt, therefore I exist’ said he. To doubt till you are convinced why a thing is what it is. To understand the relationship between cause and effect. This is scientific temper, this is scientific spirit.
A parable from the panchtantra is narrated here. It is the story of four brahmins who grew together in the same village. Three of them were erudite scholars while the fourth was a simpleton who was considered a dullard by the other three. One day the three scholars decided to travel to the city to use their learning and collect a fortune. At the first instance they thought of leaving the dullard back. But finally they took him. As they passed though the forest, they saw bones of a lion scattered around. One scholar suggested that they test their scholarship. All agreed. One of them said he could put the bones together and make a skeleton. The other said he could cover the skeleton with muscle and skin. The third said that he could breathe life into it. The three set to test their knowledge. When the lion was ready the scholar who said he could breathe life into it wanted to test his knowledge. The dullard objected saying it could be dangerous. But the third brahmin insisted on testing his knowledge when the other two ready tested theirs. Seeing this the dullard quietly climbed up a tree to see what followed. And he saw what he had guessed. The three were killed by the lion. The moral of the story is very clear. The three scholars possessed scientific knowledge but lacked scientific temper. It is this scientific temper that makes science deliver.